Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Separatism - Causes and Consequences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim Separatism - Causes and Consequences

This article fails WP:V and WP:RS. No sources at all are cited, nor is any explanation given of how this book is notable. A brief search fails to turn up anything worthwhile; Google has a few hundred hits, but nothing that really looks like a reliable source. JSTOR shows no hits at all. Unless someone comes up with a reliable third-party source that discusses this book, the article should be deleted. *** Crotalus *** 19:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and source. Goel is a notable writer. Would be helpful with some review or like-wise, that discussed the content of the book. --Soman (talk) 21:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As I stated in my nomination, the problem is that I can't seem to find any reliable third-party sources about this book. If you can, then please add them. If not, then the article should be deleted for failing to meet Wikipedia standards on verifiability. *** Crotalus *** 22:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. An outside publication about the book is required to establish its notability.Biophys (talk) 02:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable book --CltFn (talk) 05:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Soman. Shyamsunder 21:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've looked through the first 10 pages of Crotalus' web search and I don't believe I've seen anything in terms of non-trivial coverage by multiple reliable sources. You can't just say "Keep and source" if there are no realiable sources to do that with. ITAQALLAH 20:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.