- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:56, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mut@ge.Mix@ge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article about a non-notable collection of remix music. Does not pass WP:NALBUMS. Scottdrink (talk) 21:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note. The article is referenced.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - Yes, the nominator failed to notice that the article has references, so the nomination is partially invalid. The nominator also violated WP:JNN by failing to say why it's non-notable. Someone could believably call for Speedy Close for these reasons. Regardless, even though the album is obscure and probably a non-entity even for the band, CMJ is a reliable source. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, the nom does note WP:NALBUMS, which says "All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. In general, if the musician or ensemble is notable, and if the album in question has been mentioned in multiple reliable sources, then their officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." I created this article 5 years ago but things were different then. The CMJ blurb might be enough though...I even remember that Jarvis Cocker cover, I was still working in radio at the time. Tarc (talk) 17:58, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.