Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutual UFO Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot 00:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable, just UFO conspiracy people. I believe the article is vanity. FSRdomo 03:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Based on 75,000 GHits, apparently a notable UFO conspiracy group. Fan-1967 03:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep very notable UFO group (albeit a little kooky). They were even featured on X-files. Season 3 episode 9 "Nisei" Agne 03:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)while it[reply]
• Keep. Quite possibly the most prominent group in the field of UFOlogy, which, however it may frustrate the skeptical, is still a significant cultural element. -- Antaeus Feldspar 04:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Unfortunately, it is notable with people who have interest in non-reality. Keep and debunk. C56C 07:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• No need to be condescending. I don't buy into the UFO-conspiracy stuff myself, but I still find it fun and interesting to read about it. Zagalejo 20:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - evidently has some claim to be notable. Metamagician3000 11:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Appears to be among the most notable of the UFO conspiracy groups. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep Very well-known group - 246,000 Google hits for MUFON, which is the more familiar name for the organization. (225,000 for "MUFON + UFOs") Zagalejo 20:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, well-known. Whatever happened to APRO and NICAP, by the way? Ah, we have articles on them... now I know. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I have little time for UFO fans, but MUFON is very well established amongst them. Mark Grant 02:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above comments. Yamaguchi先生 09:11, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep It is a valid historical group which is part of the UFO culture, and hence, is part of our culture in general. If someone sees a reference to MUFON elsewhere, and wants to look it up to find out what it is, then they should be able to come here and do so. Papaverite 17:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.