Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muzz (talent manager)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 21:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muzz (talent manager)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable talent manager. Most refs are dead and one of the live ones doesn’t even mention him. Mccapra (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 00:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Aside from the brief mention in the 2003 Phoenix New Times article about The Format, there are a couple more mentions for the subject as "Mike Jarmuz" but I am seeing nothing specifically about the subject which could demonstrate attained notability, whether as a promoter, band manager or technician. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:ANYBIO. AllyD (talk) 08:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There are a few very brief mentions of the individual here and there, but nothing in-depth that would allow this to pass any of the guidelines mentioned above. In addition, the main claim to notability being asserted in this article appears to be his association with notable acts, and notability is not inherited. Rorshacma (talk) 16:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reliable sources means the article should be deleted.
Delete per nom. --BonkHindrance (talk) 18:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable talent manager.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete managers and crew are run of the mill, so they are rarely notable. A person who manages a band doesn't inherit notability from them. Bearian (talk) 22:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.