- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Clearly non-notable, hoping to avoid COI since I am listed below. Rudget (Help?) 17:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- MyGamingServers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable organization that fails WP:CORP. [1] is news coverage. Here are some ghits [2]. The latter simply reveals non-notable or unimportant mentions at various websites. I don't see any significant second or third party coverage. Wisdom89 (T / C) 16:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computers-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 16:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 16:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 16:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Enigma message 17:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails corp. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 17:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no mention of notability, could be tempted to A7 (corp) this one. Rudget (Help?) 17:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm surprised it wasn't speedied initially. Kafka Liz (talk) 17:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I tagged it as A7. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 17:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and second the speedy. The ELs don't work any more, which makes me thing this non-notable corp may have sunk below the internet waves. Yarr.Gazimoff WriteRead 17:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Trying to find any reliable information on this company or it's current CEO has brought up a bunch of forum adverts and arguments, but nothing that appears worthwhile. --Onorem♠Dil 17:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.