- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BJTalk 09:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- MyNetResearch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
nn website. Eolld (talk) 23:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment/Weak Delete I declined the speedy because I think there's enough to avoid a speedy but there doesn't appear to be enough RS coverage of the website apart from press reviews and blog coverage. StarM 03:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unable to verify notability due to blog and self-published sources. -- samj inout 12:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete with no prejudice against later re-creation. Notability is not established (or borderline at best); because it is commercial view one of WP:TIND takes precedence for me. 9Nak (talk) 15:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - After Google searches I was unable to find any reliable sources with which to establish notability. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 05:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.