Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Thomas Story Library

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My Thomas Story Library

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

My Thomas Story Library (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not finding any reviews in reliable independent book series. As a result, this series appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. All of the references I can find are attempting to sell me this product. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A bit sadly, as it is plausibly useful, but WP:NOTCATALOG and the topoc does not seem to have been discussed anywhere. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.