- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete both.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Mystic Realms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No assertion of notability, and no reliable or verifiable sources beyond it's own web page. DarkAudit 14:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unsourced and, in all likelihood, unsourcable. Source it or lose it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unfortunately. A search on Google turns up nothing sourcable for Mystic Realms. Regardless, I believe the following article should be added to the AfD:
- Realm of the Five, based on the fact it's a offshoot of the Mystic Realms article. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 20:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Concur with addition which is just as not-notable and unsourced. Maybe more so. DarkAudit 21:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.