- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 17:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mythkiwi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
unsourced, non-notable website. dramatic (talk) 05:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per nom. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 05:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like a really useful site, and it should be listed on all appropriate web directories. Wikipedia is not a web directory, so delete.-gadfium 08:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - SimonLyall (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.