Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NACA Technical Note No. 1629

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If Wikisource wants the material it is available at the link Mkdw pointed out. As the entire content is public ___domain I cannot see that GFDL or CC licenses and history preservation are all that relevant, but any admin may undelete the page for purposes of transwiki if needed. Sjakkalle (Check!) 19:17, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NACA Technical Note No. 1629

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability under any criteria that I can locate, and no sources at all. Coretheapple (talk) 02:30, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki to WikiSource. There is a source in the article, right at the bottom; however this verbatim transcript of a public ___domain document is not an encyclopedic topic. It would, however, be ideal for WikiSource. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:24, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki - I agree with Bushranger.--Staberinde (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly fine with me too. Coretheapple (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki... maybe. This should have been speedily deleted as copyvio of http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA381475. It's a wholesale copy of that source. Mkdw^talk 22:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a public ___domain document and isn't copyrighted. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:28, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:not for source texts. As to transwiki, is Wikisource really interested in reproducing a random piece of technobabble from the 1940s, of no apparent importance of any kind? If you think so, go ahead and do it, but don't expect others to do the work. Sandstein 21:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I withdraw what I said above. Coretheapple (talk) 00:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.