- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude (talk) 05:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- NACAr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Searches on all of the recommended sites (Google News, Google Books, etc.) have failed to turn up a result for NACAr. It has lacked sources for eight years and never had any to begin with. If the second embedded link ever contained a passing reference to this, the site's archives do not go back to the time the article was created, and the current searchable archives do not contain a mention to NACAr. Fails WP:N. Swissarmysalad (talk) 04:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 13:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - fails sourcing requirements of GNG. Most of the article is OR in one form or another. MarginalCost (talk) 13:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.