Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASA'S PROJECT BLUE BEAM
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
UNconfirmed, unverified, possibly hoax conspiracy stuff. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 21:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Noted as unconfirmed and unverified in the second sentence. An article about the theory and its history as opposed to an article supporting it. After all wikipedia does host an intelligent design page. Google turns up 500k of results, it is worth mention. I think it is worth keeping but that is just my opinion. --Meawoppl 21:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- WEAK DELETE I NORMALLY AM OK WITHOUT WP:RS ON CONSPIRACY THEORIES BUT I AM NOT SURE THIS ONE IS NOTABLE. `"PROJECT BLUE BEAM" OR "OPERATION BLUE BEAM"` GETS 34,000 HITS. EVEN AFTER READING THIS ARTICLE I AM NOT SURE WHAT THIS THEORY REALLY IS SAYING. kotepho 21:54, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If the author can show that this conspiracy has reached a high enough level of notability to be mentioned or debunked in a verifable indepedent source, then I will reevaluate. Otherwise delete as non-notable and not verifiable. Thatcher131 22:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as patent crankery. Brian G. Crawford 22:12, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Conspiracy theories (a collection).Tombride 23:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Tin-foil hat. --Elkman - (talk) 23:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. nn, fails WP:V--Jersey Devil 23:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:23, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.