Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASA reentry prototypes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. Good grief, this has existed since 2006? This is blatantly made up one day, and as such has been deleted per WP:G3. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NASA reentry prototypes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

NASA reentry prototypes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find a single reliable source discussing these "top secret" prototypes, or anything that can confirm their existence at all. If they did indeed exist, they don't seem to be notable enough for their own article. Yiosie 2356 09:52, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Spaceflight. Yiosie 2356 09:52, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No way to WP:V the claims. Nixleovel (He/They) (Talk • Contribs) 13:45, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. NASA was formed only in 1958, so they couldn't have done anything in the 1940s. Also very little is secret in NASA itself. There was work ion very high altitude balloons in the 40s and 50s that was related to space, but these have proper articles like Project Manhigh, Project Excelsior, Operation High Dive, and Project Mogul. This specific article has no sources, is not verifiable, and is wrong in stating NASA was doing anything in the 40s. Fulmard (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.