Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NBC Defence Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 02:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NBC Defence Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable institute. Despite editing from various new accounts for 3 weeks, the article has no independent sources, and no evidence of notability independent of the main university. Note: I removed one link to an unreliable "news website" (see history). Google search for English-language sources found nothing in-depth. Faculties and sub-institutes without in-depth coverage by independent reliable sources should be covered in the main article University of Defence (Czech Republic) (which also lacks sources). Wikipedia is not a webhost to publish indiscriminate organization info. GermanJoe (talk) 14:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because all articles lack any reliable sources, and have been created by the same group of COI-editors. An (admittedly quick) Google search revealed no significant coverage, only passing mentions and listings.

Please let me know, if any of the 4 institutes are special cases and need separate discussion, but it should be possible to handle them in one case. GermanJoe (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete likely as I'm not seeing any better improvement or a need for separate articles. SwisterTwister talk 18:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. I haven't been able to find any sources either. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - nothing in searches showed the notability of any of them. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.