- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Stifle (talk) 00:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Unexpandable dicdef. Prod was removed. dcandeto 06:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and it looks like the acronym was transcribed wrong in the title -- Samir
(the scope) 06:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC) - Delete per above --TBC
??? ??? ??? 07:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC) - Expand / Redirect, DNAPL has 190000 Google hits and 'Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid' 15800. It has also it's 'own website' http://www.getf.org/dnaplguest/. So there should be plenty of information. Maybe it should redirect to something like Interagency Dense Non Aqueous Phase Liquid Consortium (IDC) Gu 07:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete; not only the title is wrong, but also the definition! There is really no point in having the article in its current status. - Liberatore(T) 17:45, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.