Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NEUA (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete and repair overwrite of older afd. JERRY talk contribs 05:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- NEUA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Note this is actually the third nomination. The previous AfD used the same discussion page and can be found here. --Salix alba (talk) 12:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating again, as the concerns brought up in previous AFD have not been addressed. As the article currently stands, it is not verifiable using reliable sources. If this can be corrected, this nomination may be withdrawn. Triona (talk) 12:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and inform relevant wikiprojects. It was a relatively well known warez group. 132.205.44.5 (talk) 19:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't meet WP:V and WP:RS, and apparently never will be able to, judging from the past history. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 03:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Week delete apparently referenced in [1] but nothing in this article demonstrates any notibility. --Salix alba (talk) 12:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.