Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGO Post

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker^talk 00:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NGO Post

NGO Post (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real content. Rathfelder (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: practically no content. No claim of notability. Links are broken. OtterAM (talk) 21:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Purely promotional. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 04:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nowhere near significant WP:RS coverage sufficent to pass WP:GNG.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, sources are awful.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  10:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.