Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIXEL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-01-02 08:33Z

NIXEL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Non-notable software jargon. Completely fails Google test. [1] Edcolins 20:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unsourced/unverifiable. This is the sort of term I would expect Google to turn up, if it existed. Demiurge 20:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unverified. Heimstern Läufer 21:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and above. -- Kicking222 21:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom; no cites given, apparently unverifiable. -- The Anome 01:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.