Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Grad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The club lacks substantial coverage in multiple independent sources. TadejM ^{my talk} 13:37, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NK Grad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable amateur club, never played higher than third division. Cannot find any significant coverage - there is this detailed article about the club's history, but this is probably WP:PRIMARY since it is published on the official website of the Municipality of Grad and is therefore not independent. There are some other trivial articles and routine reports, like news about the club's new president and very short routine match reports. Cannot see how this passes WP:GNG. Snowflake91 (talk) 14:14, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Slovenia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep For a third division team, they have been consistently covered over a period of years by at least Svet24.si, there's probably more out there, football is relatively well covered in this part of the world. Relatively difficult to search for because Grad is a common word. SportingFlyer T·C 14:55, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Svet24.si has only covered them in a short routine match reports, like 1, 2, 3 etc., don't know if coverage like "they played the match, they won, and here are a few pics from the match" is enough for GNG. Snowflake91 (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but continued coverage in the sports pages is generally what makes a sports team notable, and online coverage only goes as far back as 2018 as far as I can tell. SportingFlyer T·C 22:28, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:53, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:13, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:17, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 19:57, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - entirely local coverage for an amateur team. Bearian (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.