Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadeea (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure). ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 15:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Nadeea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article was created in June and tagged in July with a request for better references. Though there have been a few dozen edits since, better sources have not been provided. I don't believe that there are any. Most of the sources are self published, fluff pieces, or links to various sites that only confirm that the subject and her works exist. I don't see any improvement from the last time it was deleted. Dismas|(talk) 20:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- keep - passes WP:MUSIC.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- keep - passes WP:MUSIC. Citations provided for her being distributed by a major record distributor Btakita (talk) 02:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "keep" - passes WP:MUSIC Kimyamaguchi (talk) 19:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.