Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakshatra(Filmmaker)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Improper nomination. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nakshatra (Filmmaker)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello, Removed all the sentences which did not prove the claims and now only keeping sentences with valid sourcess and citations. You can review article and our sources once again. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amytrish (talk • contribs) 06:19, 8 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

It should be brought to the notice of fellow wikipedians, that this article, still seems pompous personal propaganda. There are zillions who make short films on GLBT Issues and win awards it solely cannot be the reason to have a Wikipedia page. I request intervention of the community to step in and guard Wikipedia against potential propagandistic attacks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smarojitbiz (talk • contribs) 11:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above editor User:Smarojitbiz . Under Criteria G11 of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion this should be deleted. Thefriendlycasper (talk) 12:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Casper ( talk) 09 April 2013 (UTC) — Thefriendlycasper (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

I agree with the persons above me. It's clearly a propaganda-based page. (1) Anupam Kher did NOT create the cash prize money BECAUSE of 'Logging out'. (B) What are 'homosexuality awareness projects'? (C) Part of Indian gay activism? Because he walked the march? There were thousands others at every march possible around the country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloggermahoday (talk • contribs) 16:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC) — Bloggermahoday (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

It's really funny to see how people made fake/new accounts just to trash this guy. I smell jealousy and personal hatred here. Wiki community should focus on article's sources and not at the barking dogs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idiotbox123 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC) — Idiotbox123 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: Relisted for discussion as the original AFD was not properly formed or listed. Please pardon the mess.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, | Uncle Milty | talk | 17:20, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close. Apparent bad-faith nomination: all of the above accounts have been created exclusively to comment on this AfD and the nominated page. No actual reason for deletion has been given, except for an after-the-fact and, in my opinion spurious, claim of WP:G11. Dricherby (talk) 00:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.