- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep Arkyan • (talk) 20:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Name generator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article is written like an advertisement. The subject of the article does not satisfy the notability guideline on Wikipedia:Companies - Masterpedia 22:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- 5 ordinary pages link to it. It is not an advertisement: it describes a type of programs, not one particular program product of one firm. Anthony Appleyard 22:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this is not an advert, the links are to three different companies. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 22:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, at heart this is a dicdef, and the external links are spam. --Dhartung | Talk 01:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nom. --Masterpedia 03:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This does not promote any particular product. There are such programs, they have been is use for years, DGG 05:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is about such programs in general, not a particular one. The links are examples. If anyone feels its spam they should contest the links, not request AfD. Maurog 07:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is article is generic although agree it can be improved Paul Ashton 02:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.