Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namesake Entertainment
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sango123 00:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not seem to be notable per WP:CORP, only hits in Google is company's own website, no independent mention. Leuko 03:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keepDelete. They're in the IMdB [1]. However, while we tend to accept any performer with IMdB credits, does merely being in the IMdB make a production company notable? Daniel Case 04:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Comment: Per WP:CORP, "The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself." The listing in IMDB is trivial, because all it does is list the movies which the company has been associated with. Also, that is one published work, where WP:CORP requires "multiple." Leuko 04:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Question answered; changing my vote. Daniel Case 04:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I know the above user already changed his vote, but I simply wanted to point out that IMDb is in no way a measure of significance, and that people are not even remotely guaranteed they have a WP article because they have an IMDb entry. I have an entry (for donating to The 1 Second Film)), while a friend of mine starred in an actual movie. Neither of us has a WP page, nor do either of us (but especially not me) deserve them... nor do people who played corpses on CSI or spoke one line in a film. -- Kicking222 21:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Per WP:CORP, "The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself." The listing in IMDB is trivial, because all it does is list the movies which the company has been associated with. Also, that is one published work, where WP:CORP requires "multiple." Leuko 04:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and subsequent information. Wryspy 04:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above; no reliable sources indicating that this production house meets WP:CORP. --Kinu t/c 05:11, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above... nn company producing nn films. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • ER • 09:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN. StuffOfInterest 14:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. —Khoikhoi 22:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.