- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Nandavarta. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 02:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nandavart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One statement article with no references. This article had multiple issues since years and is unlikely to be corrected. Rahuljain2307 (talk) 15:52, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 18. Snotbot t • c » 16:17, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 16:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdwtalk 09:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Nandavarta - the same word in Sanskrit, short 'a's being implied rather than written. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Chiswick Chap's argument; incorporate Sanskrit spelling into Nandavarta article. Ammodramus (talk) 13:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT specifically not a dictionary. BO | Talk 14:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect: to Nandavarta, to the editor ignorant of the subject they seem to describe the same thing. BO: see the Nandavarta article, it is hardly a dictionary definition; it is an article albeit poorly sourced (though that could be improved). הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 02:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.