Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NanoCT samples: Paper sample (Skyscan-2011)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. --Celestianpower ^háblame 13:53, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

None of these pages seem to do anything but show samples from microscope and x-ray scans. There is no encyclopedic value at all to any of these pages, so delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 00:32, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom. FRS 03:24, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. No vote, but in a weird way, I can see how this would be really useful to someone in the field - pics are too big to go in regular articles, and yet are interesting and probably notable. Must ponder on this one long and hard.  BD2412 ^talk 03:45, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree. While not enclopedic in a traditional sense, Wikipedia needs to find a home for such items. --JahJah 08:35, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • I honestly don't see how these are encyclopedic even in the wikipedic sense. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.Gator1 14:19, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and suggest that the creator donate these images to Commons. --DrTorstenHenning 17:06, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete although I agree that we should find a place for this info. Can't we move this to wikisource or such? -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 19:31, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.