Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narrative Capital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:34, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Narrative Capital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. A Google search for Narrative Capital Partners turned up no third party references (except for an opposition in the USPTO to a trademark application filed by Narrative Capital). The sources cited in the article either (1) do not mention Narrative Capital or (2) are self-published or unreliable (IMDb). Narky Blert (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and this is honestly speedy material since the only claims of significance are thin, involving their clients (essentially PR-coated), none of this actually substantiates what could be improved for its own convincing article. SwisterTwister talk 19:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO; 0 indications of notability or significance -- A7 material. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.