Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Cole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Plus One (band). Protection does not seem to be necessary but if asked for can be requested at WP:RFPP. It doesn't seem that there is consensus on a merge, but certainly on removing the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Cole

Nate Cole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Notability seems to derive from being a member of Plus One. Natg 19 (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No more sign of notability than there was all the previous times this article has been deleted. --Deskford (talk) 00:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, possibly then making a protected redirect to Plus One (band) (else just salt) - David Gerard (talk) 12:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge back into Plus_One_(band), which is our usual compromise solution in such cases where a solo musician isn't really that notable outside of his work with the old band. Bearian (talk) 19:02, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Plus One (band), where he is already covered in some detail. No need for addition merging; no need to delete before redirecting. If there is a problem with the article being re-created, the redirect could be protected. (I would note that the previous deletions were in the period 2007-2009.) --MelanieN (talk) 01:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.