Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Geographic Bee Sample Questions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - author agreed that it should be deleted on the talk page. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:31, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National Geographic Bee Sample Questions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article appears to be purely hypothetical, original research. JNW (talk) 00:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete Spelling bee questions? My only comment is this should have been a speedy delete Rotovia (talk) 00:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's great the editor was trying to be helpful. However "Here are some questions you might be asked..." goes against at least two WP major policies right away. Real examples of questions should be given in the article on the Bee, with sources of course. Borock (talk) 00:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's all WP:OR. Unschool 00:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given this post, in which the article's creator acknowledges it should be deleted, then I see little reason to wait a full seven days. Unschool 01:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • The standard is 5 days, not 7. Doesn't really matter here. I say Delete, article (by its own admission) is nothing more than possible questions someone would see on a Geographic Bee. TJ Spyke 04:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per nom Niteshift36 (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.