Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Reconstruction Front

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 04:37, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National Reconstruction Front

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

National Reconstruction Front (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable, no sources, this is a dictionary entry, not a wikipedia article Yilku1 (talk) 14:34, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Haiti. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – This article would benefit from an expansion, but in regard to notability specifically, it had coverage in local press because it was the product of a failed coup and won seats in the 2006 Haitian general election. Example source in French. Yue🌙 08:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:14, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, The article could, and should be expanded much more than it is now, but seeing that it has won seats in the Haitian chamber of deputies, I would argue it meets notability. -Samoht27 (talk) 19:37, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per @Samoht27 and @Eddie891-- AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 23:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Notable enough. I also found RS. The article in French Wikipedia has more sources too. -- Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 14:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the party had seats in parliament. I've added two references to the article. toweli (talk) 14:24, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.