Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Training Laboratories
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 02:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- National Training Laboratories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Neutral bump from speedy. —Quarl (talk) 2006-11-27 07:29Z
- Delete - fails WP:ORG and reads like an advertisement. Jayden54 10:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Appears to be mentioned in academic journals[1] and journal collector JSTOR[2]. Has other relevant Google links I didn't check too.[3]. - Mgm|(talk) 10:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak DeleteKeep as modified. I'll trust Dhartung's judgment below on this being a legit topic. My previous commment: "My gut tells me this is the sort of article that can be saved from deletion, but right now, the article merely lifts a chunk of text from the "official website" without providing any substantial NPOV facts. Where do I turn in my Buzzword Bingo card?" --Dachannien 15:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep - edit, and verify. Don't delete. Trollderella 17:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - influential behavioral psychology institute. Needs a proper article. I'll de-copyvio and stub it. --Dhartung | Talk 19:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - useful stub now that deserves to be fleshed out. B.Wind 23:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.