Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Snow Buildings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 02:23, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Snow Buildings

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 21:33, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 09:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 09:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 09:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article reads like a promotional writeup than anything, and I concur that it does not WP:NBAND or WP:GNG.TH1980 (talk) 14:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as they do have significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as this AllMusic staff written bio here and two staff written album reviews there, also coverage in Pitchfork here. Haven't done a full search yet, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:02, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Album Of The Year lists 6 critic reviews for them, including Sputnikmusic,[1][2][3] and Mojo,[4]. I also found others like Brainwashed,[5] Tiny Mix Tapes,[6] Impose,[7] and Uncut,[8] among others. Whoever made the page just didn't include them for some reason, maybe they didn't know it was necessary. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 01:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per souces provided by BuySomeApples and Atlantic306. Passes WP:NBAND. These sources should be added to the article. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.