Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural intelligence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 07:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Natural intelligence

appears to be original research intended to promote an as-yet-unpublished book, presumably by either the author of the book or his publisher, thus involving conflict of interest as well. GlassFET 15:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete promotional essay. Mukadderat 15:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The claims of original research (no references) and conflict of interest (author has only one other edit outside this article) are both correct. Shalom ^Hello 17:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. The only intelligent and natural thing to do. --Targeman 20:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote the entry. I was going to add a supporting quote from Einstein in which he talks of an 'intelligence' involved in the laws of the Universe and such - but there is probably no point. Thus, if my attempt to add NI to Wikipedia breaches rules, then go ahead and erase it forthwith. I assume that if my film and book are successful, then maybe NI will eventualy find its way on to Wikipedia. Until then... Psilocybinetic 11:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all of the above. Bearian 20:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.