Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature Unleashed: Avalanche
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 07:06, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nature Unleashed: Avalanche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod (on notability grounds) contested; No serious assertion of notability; Totally Unreferenced; Clearly fails WP:NF. Monty845 18:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional notes: The creator removed all the maintenance tags on the nominated page, and similar article, Avalanche:_Nature_Unleashed still has a prod active. Monty845 18:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- New editor? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Monty845 18:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Japan video title
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) France TV title
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Spain
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) UK DVD title
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Greece
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Japan English video title
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Germany
- Delete. No indication of notability; no attempt at encyclopedic content (beyond such bare facts as IMDB is a better vehicle for). It's been a week since the article was created; if the creator had anything encyclopedic to say he'd have said it by now. If at some point something notable does show up, the article can easily be recreated. What is currently in there can be pulled from IMDB. –Henning Makholm (talk) 09:49, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni↑talk↓ 03:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:32, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.