Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazi Sympathizers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  20:25, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Alleged Nazi Sympathizers". I don't see this going anywhere good. Punkmorten 20:49, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak move To List of Nazi sympathizers, would have to be very closely watched however. --Larsinio
  • Do you volunteer? It has heavy POV and verifiability issues. Punkmorten 21:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original research. Brian G. Crawford 21:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Troll magnet. Pavel Vozenilek 21:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above. What do you define as alleged? Too speculative. mhunter 22:49, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• This editor allegedly voted to delete with extreme prejudice. Slowmover 22:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete POV, OR. Troll magnet. I can easily see long edit wars in adding and removing the same names. Fan1967 22:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Initiate the final solution on this article. 65.223.100.226 00:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unless someone steps up to watch this thing, I would say it needs to go.Montco 00:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There are certainly some people that you could have verifiable information to put them in this list. Since when was being a troll magnet a reason to delete something? kotepho 05:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Since this page seems to be so controversial, I feel I should say a few words on why I started this page. I have a bachelors degree in history, so my interest is mainly historical. Over the week-end I was watching a show on the history channel that referred to Joe Kennedy’s pro-nazi stance. I remembered Lindbergh and the Duke of Windsor from previous studies on this subject. I think it is important from an historical point of view to be aware of how deeply imbedded racism and anti-semitism are in our culture. I am sure the families of these individuals would prefer to white-wash their biographical information of these now political incorrect sentiments, but I don’t think that is in the best interests of history. Note also that I included the word “alleged” in the article.
• Delete. I'm not sure inserting the word "alleged" nullifies the policies Wikipedia has on articles needing to be neutral and verifiable. Actually, I'm certain it doesn't. Proto||type 14:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as irredeemably POV and highly unverifiable. Stifle 20:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete with extreme prejudice. Useless, OR, POV magnet. -- Nikodemos 21:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no objective criteria for inclusion or exclusion. Carlossuarez46 21:49, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.