- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- NdnSIM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable if you google it, cannot find any secondary sources bo googling either TheChampionMan1234 06:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. There is not enough here to justify an article - but it's still a useful search term, I think, and should probably be redirected. But to where? ns (simulator)? Named Data Networking (NDN) - which itself redirects to Content-centric networking? Absent consensus to redirect somewhere, I think I'd have to Delete. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable simulation software. One paper comes up on scholar but I don't think that it has been published in a journal. Note the name of the author is the same as the article creator. I don't think a redirect would be appropriate in this case but the correct target article would seem to be Content-centric networking which seems to be the name one of the collaborators (PARC) of the NDN project are using. SpinningSpark 14:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.