Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Near-Extinction evolution theory (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was not Delete. Please use Talk:Near-Extinction evolution theory to decide whether to merge or just redirect. Stifle 13:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google test reveals only 26 hits on "Near-Extinction evolution theory" with most being Wiki or mirrors. In addition, Allan Silliphant, who is listed as the producer of a documentary about this topic, receives 426 hits, of which 18 mention evolution (most being Wiki and mirrors).

• Delete or merge to Population bottleneck since it probably is an population bottleneck, just assumed under a different name by the article's author. OverlordChris 21:00, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Population bottleneck. There is legit encyclopedic content here IMHO, but needs copyedit and merging into the other article. --Lockley 21:18, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect into Population bottleneck. Merge would be fine, but would require finding lots of sources and removing POV. --Allen 01:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.