Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nebulosity Quotient
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete - CrazyRougeian talk/email 00:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Was put up for speedy deletion for having no sources to speak of and apparently being original research. I switched it to PROD, which the creator removed. So now here we are... For the moment, I'm neutral. -- SCZenz 12:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable neologism with 25 unique Google hits. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 12:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. First draft said "This term was coined August 12, 1998 by Wray Curtis..." and was posted by WrayCurtis. Only Ghits are mirror and one webpage by the same name -which may or may not be connected. It was me who listed it as speedy. --Richhoncho 12:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If I'd looked at the first draft, I might have just speedied it. This is a case where following the letter of the law creates a lot of trouble, but I do prefer to interpret the speedy rules literally lest we lose good stuff by accident. -- SCZenz 12:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Richhoncho. - Mgm|(talk) 12:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. -- SCZenz
- Speedy Delete If user made up a word, the word will almost never qualify. -- Tdslappy
- Non-speedy Delete (or WP:BJ) My NQ on reading this article is 170. Speediable begins at 185. ~ trialsanderrors 16:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neologism of no notability. -- Alias Flood 17:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Richhoncho. HumbleGod 22:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR --Satori Son 07:49, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. My speedy limit is somewhere between 125-150, but this is lower than that. Obviously made up and not notable. Grandmasterka 03:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Contains virtually no content. But if anyone wants to improve it, be my guest. —
this is messedr͏̈ocker(talk)20:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.