- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:51, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nedumkallel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod, possible hoax. Unreferenced "Mediaval history" section not backed up by the bibliography - searches on the name Nedumkallel with the provided bibliography are showing no results so far; see [1] or [2] or [3]. Some sockpuppeting concerns with this one as well. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:47, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Web searches find directory listings, social media, and a scant few trivial mentions in trivial news pieces. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:51, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- If we allow this, we allow every family that existed in medieval times to have an article. Namely, all of them. Work on the caste articles for now, they need editors. Every family doesn't get an article... Maybe in 200 years, but not now. PhnomPencil talk contribs 02:19, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Delete per nom. Nothing special about this family. Salih (talk) 17:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete -- Not notable company, lots of hoax and unreferenced. --Katarighe (talk) 19:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability. Appears to be promotion of the family by a family member. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - brag piece by somebody about how cool his family is or was. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - This is not a notable family. Vincelord (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - Whoop-tee-doo there's a family named "Nedumkallel" in Kerela. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.