Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Negroid Pack-Mule

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted as an admitted hoax. Scimitar ^parley 19:40, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Google returns nothing for the term or the supposed author. Suspect hoax. --Durin 14:50, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Probable hoax, and even if true (unlikely) I don't see how a one-time comment from 180 years ago and apparently not used since could be notable anyway. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:59, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
  • On closer inspection, I'd say to speedy this. Every edit from the IP who created this article was dumb vandalism over a period of an hour or so yesterday (adding "poop" to articles, etc.) Strongly suspect this is vandalism too. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:05, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

Delete: You are all absolutley correct. This is a hoax, and I am the perpetrator. Please delete it. Sorry about all the vandalism yesterday. We all need to be immature sometimes. I would also like to request in my defense that I not be banned from editing. This won't happen anymore. I feel really bad about the whole thing. I love Carl Jung :(. He is most certainly not Carl Poop. --AnAstralCabbage

• I don't think a ban will be necessary over one hoax article and a short lame vandalism spree. I'll take it as your word not to do any more hoaxes or vandalism. The article is deleted as an admitted hoax. Here's to better editing in the future. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:26, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.