Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Harrap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 06:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Harrap

Neil Harrap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is promotional garbage, created by Neilharrap and heavily expanded by fellow kiwis NealeFamily. The subject isn't notable. The few citations given like this and this are really about the "Fly by Wire" ride and I don't think even that subject is generally notable. Harrap himself is often a mere mention. Most of what can be found online are websites associated with the subject and not independent. After two years there hasn't been cleanup and I'd say Harrap is otherwise a low-profile person. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Majority of article (if irrelevant/unencyclopedic content is removed) is not about the subject. Fails SIGCOV. Relevant content might be appropriate for an article on Fly by Wire Ride, if such an article avoided being an advertisement. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 08:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nothing further developed over the past couple of years. I agree that it does not reach notability NealeFamily (talk) 20:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A valiant cleanup effort by NealeFamily but, as you've conceded, doesn't meet notability. Mattlore (talk) 21:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.