Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil cusack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. WP:NAC—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 15:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Neil cusack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, non sourced and is a five line trivia article. Also appears to be created under a COi. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, are you joking? The article is easily sourced and certainly passes WP:ATHLETE - he was an Olympic competitor. The first three google hits for "Neil Cusack" are this, this and this. Basic editorial problems are not a reason to send something to AfD. In any case I wouldn't considered "Winner of Boston Marathon 1974, Winner of Dublin Marathon 1981, Represented Ireland in Munich and Montreal Olympic Games," trivia - he's a professional athlete. Ironholds (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep per above and google news results. ^TheWeak_Willed 14:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK no not joking, But if it's that apparent to everyone else. My apologies close the discussion.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dont sweat it, we all make mistakes. I nominated an article and within a few hours I got about 5 keeps, and about 20 sources provided. ^TheWeak_Willed

• I've taken a stab at wikifying the article and adding ironholds refs.--Cube lurker (talk) 14:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Moved to Neil Cusack, proper caps. Staxringold _talk^contribs 14:55, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I wasn't clear above. Nom withdrawn, I was using a different defintion of trivia then the encyclo was using.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Whoops, apologies. Anyways, the move was needed. Staxringold _talk^contribs 14:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.