- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete -- (☺drini♫|☎) 06:13, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:No original research Dhartung | Talk 18:47, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Not one citation of real-world usage, google turns up the term but used in many different ways, some merely jocular. --Dhartung | Talk 18:50, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, it's a neologism and the article is original research. Rhobite 19:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the term is not generally used or understood (probably a once-off coinage), and the article leaves it essentially undefined (Neo-Wave seems to mean "Any band which became popular after 2001"). RMoloney 22:47, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Neologism and a google test returns nothing relevant. Static3d 22:48, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Dhartung and the other voters. Barno 18:50, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --DanielNuyu 18:07, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.