Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-neo synthesis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to International relations theory. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 06:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neo-neo synthesis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no reason for this stub to exist. This is a relatively obscure topic which can be adequately covered on Neorealism, Neoliberalism (international relations) and International relations theory. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:38, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to IR theory article per nom. Neutrality^talk 17:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Seems to have some scholarly coverage such based on a scholar search as in The Africanist Delusion: In Defence of the Realist Tradition and the Neo-Neo Synthesis, "Neo-Neo Synthesis" and Its Inspiration, as well as sources from Smith and Neumann & Waever. Not sure if there's enough to warrant its own article or just move into a section on International relations theory though. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.