Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nepal Library Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 12:23, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nepal Library Association

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject isn’t Notable. Lacks supportive sources. Written like an essay. Rahmatula786 (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries, Organizations, and Nepal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stub or draftify there is sourcing on which to write an article, but this AI/G12 (I just can't find the source) isn't it. I'll try to clean it while at Afd, but easiest to start over. Star Mississippi 02:47, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I stubbed it. It still may be a G12 but the G11 issues have been resolved. Star Mississippi 02:55, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:11, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a reminder that AfD is not a venue for article improvement. In terms of notability, NLA is clearly the national reference organization and affiliate with IFLA. Quick search shows plenty of available sources. --Soman (talk) 21:13, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I don't see anything here that justifies WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Is just an entity with a noble purpose, but without any encyclopedic relevance. Svartner (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:16, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Better now its been reduced to a stub, it is ultimately encyclopedic in the context of many other international library associations eg. as listed in the category - Category:Library_associations Rhagfyr (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Its inclusion in the Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science is enough for me. Moritoriko (talk) 06:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.