- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was (speedy) delete. - Bobet 02:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Essentially advertising for a future company RHB 19:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. --Jeff 20:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam for a company that isn't even up and running yet. -- Whpq 21:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - spam for nonexistent company. I'd even suggest putting the padlock on this one as I suspect the author will recreate it at first opportunity. B.Wind 01:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - spam. Remove padlock, as it is not needed anymore! 213.240.234.212 18:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Standard Procedure. --Zegoma beach 18:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is NOT a soapbox FirefoxMan 00:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait, didn't the author just ask for it to be deleted? (See above) FirefoxMan 00:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.