Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nerdy Numbers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 02:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nerdy Numbers

Nerdy Numbers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, not even in worldcat. No valid references DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This book fails our notability guideline for books. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find enough to justify an article for all three books, let alone one. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. At a minimum, we have required that books be listed in Worldcat in order to pass WP:BOOKS. Bearian (talk) 22:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.