Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nestor Aaron Absera
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Even if the second !voter didn't mean it, there is consensus. JohnCD (talk) 10:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nestor Aaron Absera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Actor WP:BLP with no reliable source, no indication of meeting WP:BIO. Contested PROD. Sandstein 06:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable actor. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 07:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I am a bit depressed these days, and if I get to delete the work of someone else it will make me feel better. That editor will surely get pissed off once he sees that his work was wasted, which will only increase my pleasure. Besides wikipedia has already lost so many editors, losing one more will not make a difference. Not to mention the warm feeling that comes from declaring that someone is "insignificant". Yeah, let's go for it! --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Jorge Stolfi, I make no comment in relation to this particular article but I'm afraid - as you're probably aware - your irony will have as much effect as spitting in the wind. I sometimes wonder about the long-term trend of the age distribution of Wikipedia editors. Opbeith (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well,I don't really care bout this article; it was one of several random new articles that I tried to clean up as "good citizen duty". Alas that work of mine will be wasted too, together with that of the article's creator. I have learned my lesson, and don't plan to do that mistake again. All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 07:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Jorge Stolfi, I make no comment in relation to this particular article but I'm afraid - as you're probably aware - your irony will have as much effect as spitting in the wind. I sometimes wonder about the long-term trend of the age distribution of Wikipedia editors. Opbeith (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice toward recreation. His work can be WP:Verified through the projects themselves, but his career needs to grow a bit and gets coverage to meet WP:BIO. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.