- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Net-C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not-notable software. No reviews or outside mentions that I could find; just the fact that it exists. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 02:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No evident news, scholar, or books hits for any date for "Net-c" + dgtalize (the creators); web hits don't even appear to offer any reviews, so not notable. Gonzonoir (talk) 21:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable as per Gonzonoir and nom. --Ged UK (talk) 11:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.