Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetDNA (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:53, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NetDNA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Advertising. Sources are numerous but seem weak. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 16:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 00:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There's nothing available to satisfy notability in the current references; the best content comes from several cdn-advisor.com articles, but I'm really not convinced about it's reliability. Apart from those, you can find a lot of press releases being reproduced verbatim, or that are used as articles with little to no additional commentary, such as [1] [2] [3]. Then there's this very passing mention [4], but that's all — Frankie (talk) 17:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CORP. Little or no independent coverage found. As Frankie says, most of the hits that look like articles turn out to be regurgitated press releases. --MelanieN (talk) 22:55, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.