- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ironholds (talk) 13:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- NetGPad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject has not received significant coverage in independent sources and thus fails WP:GNG. wctaiwan (talk) 15:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I didn't see anything on Google, Google News and Yahoo that would be appropriate for Wikipedia.SwisterTwister talk 20:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
netGPad is a free Gujarati Unicode Text Editor. The aim of this article - NetGPad is just knowledge for people who like to write Gujarati. There are many references in the aritcle which can give you references of netGPad. Thus it full fill the all requirements of WikiPedia article. So, it should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nileshbandhiya (talk • contribs) 05:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Been meaning to AfD this myself, actually, but wctaiwan got there first. I can't find any useful sources for this being notable in any of the usual places, and there's none shown in the article itself. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the references provided are to a wordpress blog and a google code page. Neither of these meet the standard of reliable source independent coverage. Dialectric (talk) 11:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per A7 - No reliable indication of notability is provided anywhere in the article and the article itself reads very much like an apple-written advertisement aimed at people who use Gujarati as a first language. Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 23:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.